Firefox 54 Could Very Well be Mozilla’s Best Browser

There was a time when Mozilla’s Firefox browser was the browser of choice for those who refused to use Internet Explorer. Unfortunately for Mozilla, the browser has been playing second fiddle to Google Chrome since 2011.

Now, the company is looking to regain the throne that Google took from it with the release of Firefox 54, and if the company is to be believed, the latest version of Firefox would be Mozilla’s finest yet.

The key to Firefox 54’s superiority lies in its speed. After years of relying on a single process to run all the tabs in a single browser, Mozilla has finally decided to adopt the “multiple process” technology that browsers like Chrome, Edge, Safari and many others have been using.

Codenamed Electrolysis or E10s, this technology will allow Firefox 54 to use up to four processes to run web page content across all open tabs. In practice, this would allow Firefox 54 to run faster while crashing less frequently.

runs faster and less crashing

In addition to better performance, Firefox 54 also has the honor of being the browser that consumes the least amount of RAM when compared to a number of other browsers running on Windows 10, macOS and Linux. This particular bit of info would be good news to those who have aging machines.

using the least of ram

Besides the major performance boost, Firefox 54 will also be introducing some minor changes to the browser’s features. A full list of changes can be found here.

Firefox 54 Could Very Well be Mozilla’s Best Browser

There was a time when Mozilla’s Firefox browser was the browser of choice for those who refused to use Internet Explorer. Unfortunately for Mozilla, the browser has been playing second fiddle to Google Chrome since 2011.

How to Optimize Firefox for Better Performance

.no-js #ref-block-post-11149 .ref-block__thumbnail { background-image: url(“http://media02.hongkiat.com/thumbs/250×160/firefox-optimization-tips.jpg”); }

How to Optimize Firefox for Better Performance

Your web browser of choice is truly the gateway into accessing the global Internet. The web has been…Read more

Now, the company is looking to regain the throne that Google took from it with the release of Firefox 54, and if the company is to be believed, the latest version of Firefox would be Mozilla’s finest yet.

The key to Firefox 54’s superiority lies in its speed. After years of relying on a single process to run all the tabs in a single browser, Mozilla has finally decided to adopt the “multiple process” technology that browsers like Chrome, Edge, Safari and many others have been using.

Codenamed Electrolysis or E10s, this technology will allow Firefox 54 to use up to four processes to run web page content across all open tabs. In practice, this would allow Firefox 54 to run faster while crashing less frequently.

runs faster and less crashing

In addition to better performance, Firefox 54 also has the honor of being the browser that consumes the least amount of RAM when compared to a number of other browsers running on Windows 10, macOS and Linux. This particular bit of info would be good news to those who have aging machines.

using the least of ram

Besides the major performance boost, Firefox 54 will also be introducing some minor changes to the browser’s features. A full list of changes can be found here.

10 Firefox Plugins For A Safer Browsing Experience

.no-js #ref-block-post-15177 .ref-block__thumbnail { background-image: url(“http://media02.hongkiat.com/thumbs/250×160/firefox-security-plugins.jpg”); }

10 Firefox Plugins For A Safer Browsing Experience

Mozilla’s Firefox browser is a user-friendly and feature-rich browser, with around 35% of all web users using it…Read more

Firefox 52 is Out – Here’s What’s New

Firefox users are in for a treat as the latest version of Mozilla’s web browser has gotten a new build in the form of Firefox 52. As with every other major builds, Firefox 52 comes with new features and more. Here are the three main features and changes that you’ll see with Firefox 52.

WebAssembly support is now available on Firefox 52

Back in 2015, Mozilla, Google, Microsoft and Apple teamed up to develop an efficient bytecode that can be run effectively by JavaScript virtual machines. Said bytecode is called WebAssembly (Wasm) and it is now making its debut on Firefox 52.

So what can you expect from Wasm? For starters, this new bytecode will allow complex applications and games to run in a browser at near-native performance without the need for plug-ins.

Games and apps are just the first step for Wasm of course, as the folks at Mozilla envision that the bytecode will soon be utilised on productivity apps and JavaScript frameworks, leading to reduced load times and improved performance.

Firefox 52 will begin flagging websites that use HTTP as insecure

In Firefox 51, the browser notifies users of non-secure HTTP websites with a simple icon found in the address bar. With Firefox 52, Mozilla is getting more aggressive in its “anti-HTTP” stance by displaying warning messages whenever a user clicks on the username and password fields on non-HTTPS pages.

On top of that, Firefox 52 will also support a policy called “Strict Secure Cookies”. This policy forbids HTTP websites from setting cookies that have the “secure” attribute.

strict security cookies
Firefox 52 will discontinue NPAPI plugin support

Google has done it, Microsoft has done it, now Mozilla will also be discontinuing support for almost all Netscape Plugin Application Programming Interface (NPAPI) plugins. The only exception to this is Flash, as Mozilla still considers its to be widely used by many. Nevertheless, the company does plan to make Flash operate on an “on-demand” basis later this year.

Besides the new features and changes, Firefox 52 will also be the last version of the browser that will support Windows XP and Windows Vista. Those looking for a full changelog for Firefox 52 can find it here.

Firefox 52 is Out – Here’s What’s New

Firefox users are in for a treat as the latest version of Mozilla’s web browser has gotten a new build in the form of Firefox 52. As with every other major builds, Firefox 52 comes with new features and more. Here are the three main features and changes that you’ll see with Firefox 52.

10 Coolest Hidden Firefox Settings You Should Know

.no-js #ref-block-post-27666 .ref-block__thumbnail { background-image: url(“http://media02.hongkiat.com/thumbs/250×160/hidden-firefox-settings.jpg”); }

10 Coolest Hidden Firefox Settings You Should Know

There are plenty of settings that Firefox offers besides general ones you can find in the Options menu.…Read more

WebAssembly support is now available on Firefox 52

Back in 2015, Mozilla, Google, Microsoft and Apple teamed up to develop an efficient bytecode that can be run effectively by JavaScript virtual machines. Said bytecode is called WebAssembly (Wasm) and it is now making its debut on Firefox 52.

So what can you expect from Wasm? For starters, this new bytecode will allow complex applications and games to run in a browser at near-native performance without the need for plug-ins.

Games and apps are just the first step for Wasm of course, as the folks at Mozilla envision that the bytecode will soon be utilised on productivity apps and JavaScript frameworks, leading to reduced load times and improved performance.

Firefox 52 will begin flagging websites that use HTTP as insecure

In Firefox 51, the browser notifies users of non-secure HTTP websites with a simple icon found in the address bar. With Firefox 52, Mozilla is getting more aggressive in its “anti-HTTP” stance by displaying warning messages whenever a user clicks on the username and password fields on non-HTTPS pages.

On top of that, Firefox 52 will also support a policy called “Strict Secure Cookies”. This policy forbids HTTP websites from setting cookies that have the “secure” attribute.

strict security cookies
Firefox 52 will discontinue NPAPI plugin support

Google has done it, Microsoft has done it, now Mozilla will also be discontinuing support for almost all Netscape Plugin Application Programming Interface (NPAPI) plugins. The only exception to this is Flash, as Mozilla still considers its to be widely used by many. Nevertheless, the company does plan to make Flash operate on an “on-demand” basis later this year.

Besides the new features and changes, Firefox 52 will also be the last version of the browser that will support Windows XP and Windows Vista. Those looking for a full changelog for Firefox 52 can find it here.

How to Optimize Firefox for Better Performance

.no-js #ref-block-post-11149 .ref-block__thumbnail { background-image: url(“http://media02.hongkiat.com/thumbs/250×160/firefox-optimization-tips.jpg”); }

How to Optimize Firefox for Better Performance

Your web browser of choice is truly the gateway into accessing the global Internet. The web has been…Read more

Browser Trends December 2016: Mobile Overtakes Desktop

In November, we looked at the underdog browsers adopted by one in thirty web users. The StatCounter browser statistics for December 2016 records a more exciting and momentous event in the web’s history …

Mobile overtakes desktop, November 2016

Worldwide Desktop & Tablet Browser Statistics, October to November 2016

The following table shows browser usage movements during the past month.

Browser October November change relative
Chrome 59.39% 59.22% -0.17% -0.30%
Firefox 13.28% 13.49% +0.21% +1.60%
IE11 6.95% 6.98% +0.03% +0.40%
oldIE 1.94% 1.81% -0.13% -6.70%
Edge 2.82% 2.93% +0.11% +3.90%
Safari 4.79% 4.69% -0.10% -2.10%
iPad Safari 5.42% 5.68% +0.26% +4.80%
Opera 1.91% 1.82% -0.09% -4.70%
Others 3.50% 3.38% -0.12% -3.40%

Worldwide Desktop & Tablet Browser Statistics, November 2015 to November 2016

The following table shows browser usage movements during the past twelve months:

Browser November 2015 November 2016 change relative
Chrome 54.27% 59.22% +4.95% +9.10%
Firefox 14.70% 13.49% -1.21% -8.20%
IE11 10.40% 6.98% -3.42% -32.90%
oldIE 5.05% 1.81% -3.24% -64.20%
Edge 1.21% 2.93% +1.72% +142.10%
Safari 9.34% 10.37% +1.03% +11.00%
Opera 1.77% 1.82% +0.05% +2.80%
Others 3.26% 3.38% +0.12% +3.70%

(The tables show market share estimates for desktop browsers. The ‘change’ column is the absolute increase or decrease in market share. The ‘relative’ column indicates the proportional change, i.e. 6.7% of oldIE users migrated elsewhere last month. There are several caveats so I recommend you read How Browser Market Share is Calculated and StatCounter vs NetMarketShare.)

Chrome experienced an uncharacteristic fall. I’m secretly pleased; I predicted Google’s browser wouldn’t reach 60% before the end of 2016! That said, -0.17% is hardly a major setback, and my predictions are notoriously awful. No doubt everyone will switch to Chrome during the next month just to prove me wrong!

A fall for Chrome generally means good news for other applications. Firefox, Edge and even IE11 all rose but the changes are hardly dramatic. Let’s move on; there’s far more interesting news on mobile …

Worldwide Mobile Browser Statistics, November 2016

Mobile browser use increased by an impressive 1.78% during November. It smashed through the parity barrier and now accounts for 50.62% of all web activity. Mobile exceeds desktop usage for the first time since the web began.

(Some sites were reporting this event last month and mobile usage did overtake desktop on certain days. However, the overall percentage for October 2016’s mobile use remained below 50%.)

We’ve been waiting some time. The “mobiles-will-overtake-desktop” prediction was raised at least a decade ago, but took longer than most expected. Possible reasons include:

  • It is difficult to do real work on a mobile device. That said, devices have grown exponentially in Asia and Africa in places where the PC revolution never occurred. Millions of people now work and trade on smartphones in ways which are troublesome in the western world. We still struggle with micro-payments and simple transactions regardless of age or financial status.
  • Network bandwidth is slow, unreliable and costly in the majority of countries. There are only so many hours you can surf and a mobile connection will impede progress. There are exciting possibilities for future technologies, but fast, always-on and inexpensive networks remain a dream.
  • The web has evolved from a predominantly desktop-based starting point. The situation has improved with Responsive Web Design and Progressive Web Apps, but many legacy sites are inoperable or impractical on a mobile device.

Does the mobile explosion change our development lives? Probably not if you’ve been reading SitePoint and watching industry trends: you’re already mobile aware. Fortunately, it will be a wake-up call for any client or boss who doubted the growth of the mobile platform or didn’t think it would affect their business. Be prepared for several “how can we make our digital experience better on a smartphone” conversations very soon.

From a technical perspective, I recommend a mobile-first approach:

  1. Design your site/application to work on smaller, narrow screens.
  2. Use media queries to progressively enhance your layout as the screen size increases.
  3. Take a simple, pragmatic approach. If you’re removing a feature because it doesn’t fit on a mobile screen, consider whether it’s necessary to offer it on the desktop.

The top mobile browsing applications for the month were:

Mobile Browser October November change relative
Chrome 40.64% 43.22% +2.58% +6.30%
iPhone 16.69% 17.43% +0.74% +4.40%
UC Browser 17.90% 16.73% -1.17% -6.50%
Opera Mini/Mobile 8.64% 8.38% -0.26% -3.00%
Samsung Internet 6.52% 6.39% -0.13% -2.00%
Android 5.83% 5.28% -0.55% -9.40%
IEMobile 1.13% 1.02% -0.11% -9.70%
Others 2.65% 1.55% -1.10% -41.50%

Chrome continues its meteoric rise at the expense of all others (especially Android Mobile, which it supersedes). While I don’t use Chrome as my default desktop browser, I have no hesitation in recommending it on mobile. I’m yet to find an alternative which offers a better experience.

The iPhone edition of Safari and UC Browser continue to dance round each other. Following a month at the coveted #2 spot, UC Browser has been knocked back once again. However, the dominance of mobile usage will encourage people to look for better smartphone applications. Take note, Apple: your lacklustre attitude to Safari and the web could hit profitability sooner than you think.

The biggest faller was the “others” group. More than 40% of those users migrated to a mainstream browser. Perhaps it’s a statistical blip, or my underdog browser article from last month didn’t help their cause?!

See you next month for a round-up of the major browser events of 2016.

Browser Trends December 2016: Mobile Overtakes Desktop

In November, we looked at the underdog browsers adopted by one in thirty web users. The StatCounter browser statistics for December 2016 records a more exciting and momentous event in the web’s history …

Mobile overtakes desktop, November 2016

Worldwide Desktop & Tablet Browser Statistics, October to November 2016

The following table shows browser usage movements during the past month.

Browser October November change relative
Chrome 59.39% 59.22% -0.17% -0.30%
Firefox 13.28% 13.49% +0.21% +1.60%
IE11 6.95% 6.98% +0.03% +0.40%
oldIE 1.94% 1.81% -0.13% -6.70%
Edge 2.82% 2.93% +0.11% +3.90%
Safari 4.79% 4.69% -0.10% -2.10%
iPad Safari 5.42% 5.68% +0.26% +4.80%
Opera 1.91% 1.82% -0.09% -4.70%
Others 3.50% 3.38% -0.12% -3.40%

Worldwide Desktop & Tablet Browser Statistics, November 2015 to November 2016

The following table shows browser usage movements during the past twelve months:

Browser November 2015 November 2016 change relative
Chrome 54.27% 59.22% +4.95% +9.10%
Firefox 14.70% 13.49% -1.21% -8.20%
IE11 10.40% 6.98% -3.42% -32.90%
oldIE 5.05% 1.81% -3.24% -64.20%
Edge 1.21% 2.93% +1.72% +142.10%
Safari 9.34% 10.37% +1.03% +11.00%
Opera 1.77% 1.82% +0.05% +2.80%
Others 3.26% 3.38% +0.12% +3.70%

(The tables show market share estimates for desktop browsers. The ‘change’ column is the absolute increase or decrease in market share. The ‘relative’ column indicates the proportional change, i.e. 6.7% of oldIE users migrated elsewhere last month. There are several caveats so I recommend you read How Browser Market Share is Calculated and StatCounter vs NetMarketShare.)

Chrome experienced an uncharacteristic fall. I’m secretly pleased; I predicted Google’s browser wouldn’t reach 60% before the end of 2016! That said, -0.17% is hardly a major setback, and my predictions are notoriously awful. No doubt everyone will switch to Chrome during the next month just to prove me wrong!

A fall for Chrome generally means good news for other applications. Firefox, Edge and even IE11 all rose but the changes are hardly dramatic. Let’s move on; there’s far more interesting news on mobile …

Worldwide Mobile Browser Statistics, November 2016

Mobile browser use increased by an impressive 1.78% during November. It smashed through the parity barrier and now accounts for 50.62% of all web activity. Mobile exceeds desktop usage for the first time since the web began.

(Some sites were reporting this event last month and mobile usage did overtake desktop on certain days. However, the overall percentage for October 2016’s mobile use remained below 50%.)

We’ve been waiting some time. The “mobiles-will-overtake-desktop” prediction was raised at least a decade ago, but took longer than most expected. Possible reasons include:

  • It is difficult to do real work on a mobile device. That said, devices have grown exponentially in Asia and Africa in places where the PC revolution never occurred. Millions of people now work and trade on smartphones in ways which are troublesome in the western world. We still struggle with micro-payments and simple transactions regardless of age or financial status.
  • Network bandwidth is slow, unreliable and costly in the majority of countries. There are only so many hours you can surf and a mobile connection will impede progress. There are exciting possibilities for future technologies, but fast, always-on and inexpensive networks remain a dream.
  • The web has evolved from a predominantly desktop-based starting point. The situation has improved with Responsive Web Design and Progressive Web Apps, but many legacy sites are inoperable or impractical on a mobile device.

Does the mobile explosion change our development lives? Probably not if you’ve been reading SitePoint and watching industry trends: you’re already mobile aware. Fortunately, it will be a wake-up call for any client or boss who doubted the growth of the mobile platform or didn’t think it would affect their business. Be prepared for several “how can we make our digital experience better on a smartphone” conversations very soon.

From a technical perspective, I recommend a mobile-first approach:

  1. Design your site/application to work on smaller, narrow screens.
  2. Use media queries to progressively enhance your layout as the screen size increases.
  3. Take a simple, pragmatic approach. If you’re removing a feature because it doesn’t fit on a mobile screen, consider whether it’s necessary to offer it on the desktop.

The top mobile browsing applications for the month were:

Mobile Browser October November change relative
Chrome 40.64% 43.22% +2.58% +6.30%
iPhone 16.69% 17.43% +0.74% +4.40%
UC Browser 17.90% 16.73% -1.17% -6.50%
Opera Mini/Mobile 8.64% 8.38% -0.26% -3.00%
Samsung Internet 6.52% 6.39% -0.13% -2.00%
Android 5.83% 5.28% -0.55% -9.40%
IEMobile 1.13% 1.02% -0.11% -9.70%
Others 2.65% 1.55% -1.10% -41.50%

Chrome continues its meteoric rise at the expense of all others (especially Android Mobile, which it supersedes). While I don’t use Chrome as my default desktop browser, I have no hesitation in recommending it on mobile. I’m yet to find an alternative which offers a better experience.

The iPhone edition of Safari and UC Browser continue to dance round each other. Following a month at the coveted #2 spot, UC Browser has been knocked back once again. However, the dominance of mobile usage will encourage people to look for better smartphone applications. Take note, Apple: your lacklustre attitude to Safari and the web could hit profitability sooner than you think.

The biggest faller was the “others” group. More than 40% of those users migrated to a mainstream browser. Perhaps it’s a statistical blip, or my underdog browser article from last month didn’t help their cause?!

See you next month for a round-up of the major browser events of 2016.

Browser Trends November 2016: Rise of the Underdog

browser trends rise of underdog

In October, we discussed reasons why Edge has struggled to gain momentum. Are November’s StatCounter browser statistics better for Microsoft’s flagship browser? …

Worldwide Desktop & Tablet Browser Statistics, September to October 2016

The following table shows browser usage movements during the past month.

Browser September October change relative
Chrome 58.89% 59.39% +0.50% +0.80%
Firefox 13.66% 13.28% -0.38% -2.80%
IE11 7.68% 6.95% -0.73% -9.50%
oldIE 2.13% 1.94% -0.19% -8.90%
Edge 2.78% 2.82% +0.04% +1.40%
Safari 4.30% 4.79% +0.49% +11.40%
iPad Safari 5.30% 5.42% +0.12% +2.30%
Opera 1.72% 1.91% +0.19% +11.00%
Others 3.54% 3.50% -0.04% -1.10%

Worldwide Desktop & Tablet Browser Statistics, October 2015 to October 2016

The following table shows browser usage movements during the past twelve months:

Browser October 2015 October 2016 change relative
Chrome 53.78% 59.39% +5.61% +10.40%
Firefox 15.52% 13.28% -2.24% -14.40%
IE11 10.00% 6.95% -3.05% -30.50%
oldIE 5.28% 1.94% -3.34% -63.30%
Edge 1.10% 2.82% +1.72% +156.40%
Safari 9.12% 10.21% +1.09% +12.00%
Opera 1.78% 1.91% +0.13% +7.30%
Others 3.42% 3.50% +0.08% +2.30%

(The tables show market share estimates for desktop browsers. The ‘change’ column is the absolute increase or decrease in market share. The ‘relative’ column indicates the proportional change, i.e. 9.5% of oldIE users migrated elsewhere last month. There are several caveats so I recommend you read How Browser Market Share is Calculated and StatCounter vs NetMarketShare.)

Chrome continued upward at the expense of Firefox and IE, but it was also a good month for underdog browsers:

  • Edge increased. Not by much, admittedly, but at least it was the right direction.
  • Opera experienced its highest jump for several years. The browser is increasingly impressive and fast when compared with Chrome, despite using the same Blink rendering engine.
  • Safari had the best month of all, despite continued venom from the development community about Apple’s lackluster attitude to the web. It’s possible this was achieved following new OS and device releases, but the mobile chart did not record similar gains?

While it’s tempting to think there are only five main browsers, the situation is considerably more diverse. More than one in thirty web users surf with one of the ‘others’. Alternative applications have been rising steadily since early 2014 and can have a strong impact in specific countries or markets. Here is a shortlist of new and existing options you may want to consider.

Ghost

Ghost logo Ghost is a new Blink-based browser which has a unique selling point: multi-session browsing. The application allows you to set up colored tab groups which have their own set of private cookies. This allows you to log into a single website with more than one account in the same browser window. The option could be especially useful for developers.

Ghost is still in beta, but you can register for an invite.

Min

If you think browsers provide too much cruft, Min strips the web back to absolute basics. Features include tab management, ad-blocking and little else. Currently available for MacOS and Ubuntu, Min is an Electron application developed in HTML, CSS and JavaScript.

Project Maelstrom

Modestly titled “the future of the web is here”, Project Maelstrom renders standard HTTP-served pages as well as those packaged as torrents. Files can then be downloaded from multiple peers rather than a single server, which increases network bandwidth and reliability. The beta Blink-based browser can be downloaded today.

UC Browser

UC Browser logoUC Browser has overtaken the iPhone to reach second place in the mobile chart, but is available for a range of desktop, tablet, smartphone and feature phone devices. The application is owned by the Chinese Alibaba Group (a cross between Amazon and eBay but considerably bigger than both). It uses its own U3 rendering engine.

Other popular Chinese applications include Qihoo 360 Secure, Sogou Explorer and QQ Browser.

Maxthon

Maxthon browserPerhaps the only Chinese browser to achieve western appeal, Maxthon offers both the Trident (IE) and WebKit rendering engine. This was useful in the early years of the century when many sites were “best viewed in IE”.

Lunascape

Lunascape browserIf two rendering engines isn’t enough, Lunascape provides three in a single browser: Trident, Gecko and WebKit. Developers can view the same page in a three-way cascade view to ensure pixel-perfect alignment. The application is available for Windows and Android, with Mac OS coming soon. There is also an iOS edition, but it’s a Safari clone owing to Apple’s restrictions.

Pale Moon Browser

Pale Moon browserPale Moon is open-source browser fork of Firefox which uses its own Goanna rendering engine. It is available for Windows, Linux and Android (MacOS in development). The browser will continue to support XUL and XPCOM add-ons despite Mozilla’s future intentions for the technologies.

Yandex

Yandex browserYandex is the first alternative browser to appear in the StatCounter figures. The free desktop, tablet and smartphone Blink-based browser is provided by Russian web search corporation Yandex. The application currently holds 9% of the Russian market, despite strong competition from Google.

Coc Coc

Coc Coc browserAnother Blink-based option, Coc Coc is aimed at the Vietnamese market but also provides an English translation. The browser is the second most popular browser in Vietnam with a 24% market share.

Would you prefer something a little more mainstream? Why not consider the Blisk development browser or see How Do Chrome’s Rivals Stack Up?

Worldwide Mobile Browser Statistics, October 2016

Mobile browser use increased by a significant 1.66% during October. It now accounts for 48.84% of all web activity. The long-promised mobile/desktop parity could be upon us shortly.

The top mobile browsing applications for the month were:

Mobile Browser September October change relative
Chrome 39.09% 40.64% +1.55% +4.00%
UC Browser 17.04% 17.90% +0.86% +5.00%
iPhone 17.90% 16.69% -1.21% -6.80%
Opera Mini/Mobile 9.77% 8.64% -1.13% -11.60%
Samsung Internet 6.86% 6.52% -0.34% -5.00%
Android 6.33% 5.83% -0.50% -7.90%
IEMobile 1.26% 1.13% -0.13% -10.30%
Others 1.75% 2.65% +0.90% +51.40%

Chrome continues to grow rapidly, but the main news is that UC Browser knocked the iPhone from the #2 spot. UC has been in that position before, but its five-month stint ended in May 2016. Strangely, the iPhone dropped considerably compared to the increases for Safari on the iPad and Mac OS? Perhaps the situation will settle next month.

Browser Trends November 2016: Rise of the Underdog

browser trends rise of underdog

In October, we discussed reasons why Edge has struggled to gain momentum. Are November’s StatCounter browser statistics better for Microsoft’s flagship browser? …

Worldwide Desktop & Tablet Browser Statistics, September to October 2016

The following table shows browser usage movements during the past month.

Browser September October change relative
Chrome 58.89% 59.39% +0.50% +0.80%
Firefox 13.66% 13.28% -0.38% -2.80%
IE11 7.68% 6.95% -0.73% -9.50%
oldIE 2.13% 1.94% -0.19% -8.90%
Edge 2.78% 2.82% +0.04% +1.40%
Safari 4.30% 4.79% +0.49% +11.40%
iPad Safari 5.30% 5.42% +0.12% +2.30%
Opera 1.72% 1.91% +0.19% +11.00%
Others 3.54% 3.50% -0.04% -1.10%

Worldwide Desktop & Tablet Browser Statistics, October 2015 to October 2016

The following table shows browser usage movements during the past twelve months:

Browser October 2015 October 2016 change relative
Chrome 53.78% 59.39% +5.61% +10.40%
Firefox 15.52% 13.28% -2.24% -14.40%
IE11 10.00% 6.95% -3.05% -30.50%
oldIE 5.28% 1.94% -3.34% -63.30%
Edge 1.10% 2.82% +1.72% +156.40%
Safari 9.12% 10.21% +1.09% +12.00%
Opera 1.78% 1.91% +0.13% +7.30%
Others 3.42% 3.50% +0.08% +2.30%

(The tables show market share estimates for desktop browsers. The ‘change’ column is the absolute increase or decrease in market share. The ‘relative’ column indicates the proportional change, i.e. 9.5% of oldIE users migrated elsewhere last month. There are several caveats so I recommend you read How Browser Market Share is Calculated and StatCounter vs NetMarketShare.)

Chrome continued upward at the expense of Firefox and IE, but it was also a good month for underdog browsers:

  • Edge increased. Not by much, admittedly, but at least it was the right direction.
  • Opera experienced its highest jump for several years. The browser is increasingly impressive and fast when compared with Chrome, despite using the same Blink rendering engine.
  • Safari had the best month of all, despite continued venom from the development community about Apple’s lackluster attitude to the web. It’s possible this was achieved following new OS and device releases, but the mobile chart did not record similar gains?

While it’s tempting to think there are only five main browsers, the situation is considerably more diverse. More than one in thirty web users surf with one of the ‘others’. Alternative applications have been rising steadily since early 2014 and can have a strong impact in specific countries or markets. Here is a shortlist of new and existing options you may want to consider.

Ghost

Ghost logo Ghost is a new Blink-based browser which has a unique selling point: multi-session browsing. The application allows you to set up colored tab groups which have their own set of private cookies. This allows you to log into a single website with more than one account in the same browser window. The option could be especially useful for developers.

Ghost is still in beta, but you can register for an invite.

Min

If you think browsers provide too much cruft, Min strips the web back to absolute basics. Features include tab management, ad-blocking and little else. Currently available for MacOS and Ubuntu, Min is an Electron application developed in HTML, CSS and JavaScript.

Project Maelstrom

Modestly titled “the future of the web is here”, Project Maelstrom renders standard HTTP-served pages as well as those packaged as torrents. Files can then be downloaded from multiple peers rather than a single server, which increases network bandwidth and reliability. The beta Blink-based browser can be downloaded today.

UC Browser

UC Browser logoUC Browser has overtaken the iPhone to reach second place in the mobile chart, but is available for a range of desktop, tablet, smartphone and feature phone devices. The application is owned by the Chinese Alibaba Group (a cross between Amazon and eBay but considerably bigger than both). It uses its own U3 rendering engine.

Other popular Chinese applications include Qihoo 360 Secure, Sogou Explorer and QQ Browser.

Maxthon

Maxthon browserPerhaps the only Chinese browser to achieve western appeal, Maxthon offers both the Trident (IE) and WebKit rendering engine. This was useful in the early years of the century when many sites were “best viewed in IE”.

Lunascape

Lunascape browserIf two rendering engines isn’t enough, Lunascape provides three in a single browser: Trident, Gecko and WebKit. Developers can view the same page in a three-way cascade view to ensure pixel-perfect alignment. The application is available for Windows and Android, with Mac OS coming soon. There is also an iOS edition, but it’s a Safari clone owing to Apple’s restrictions.

Pale Moon Browser

Pale Moon browserPale Moon is open-source browser fork of Firefox which uses its own Goanna rendering engine. It is available for Windows, Linux and Android (MacOS in development). The browser will continue to support XUL and XPCOM add-ons despite Mozilla’s future intentions for the technologies.

Yandex

Yandex browserYandex is the first alternative browser to appear in the StatCounter figures. The free desktop, tablet and smartphone Blink-based browser is provided by Russian web search corporation Yandex. The application currently holds 9% of the Russian market, despite strong competition from Google.

Coc Coc

Coc Coc browserAnother Blink-based option, Coc Coc is aimed at the Vietnamese market but also provides an English translation. The browser is the second most popular browser in Vietnam with a 24% market share.

Would you prefer something a little more mainstream? Why not consider the Blisk development browser or see How Do Chrome’s Rivals Stack Up?

Worldwide Mobile Browser Statistics, October 2016

Mobile browser use increased by a significant 1.66% during October. It now accounts for 48.84% of all web activity. The long-promised mobile/desktop parity could be upon us shortly.

The top mobile browsing applications for the month were:

Mobile Browser September October change relative
Chrome 39.09% 40.64% +1.55% +4.00%
UC Browser 17.04% 17.90% +0.86% +5.00%
iPhone 17.90% 16.69% -1.21% -6.80%
Opera Mini/Mobile 9.77% 8.64% -1.13% -11.60%
Samsung Internet 6.86% 6.52% -0.34% -5.00%
Android 6.33% 5.83% -0.50% -7.90%
IEMobile 1.26% 1.13% -0.13% -10.30%
Others 1.75% 2.65% +0.90% +51.40%

Chrome continues to grow rapidly, but the main news is that UC Browser knocked the iPhone from the #2 spot. UC has been in that position before, but its five-month stint ended in May 2016. Strangely, the iPhone dropped considerably compared to the increases for Safari on the iPad and Mac OS? Perhaps the situation will settle next month.

Browser Trends October 2016: Microsoft Edges Downward

Microsoft Edge

In September, we discussed whether the browser wars are over. October’s StatCounter browser statistics provide further evidence for a slow-down …

Worldwide Desktop & Tablet Browser Statistics, August to September 2016

The following table shows browser usage movements during the past month.

Browser August September change relative
Chrome 58.44% 58.89% +0.45% +0.80%
Firefox 13.96% 13.66% -0.30% -2.10%
IE11 7.52% 7.68% +0.16% +2.10%
oldIE 2.30% 2.13% -0.17% -7.40%
Edge 2.88% 2.78% -0.10% -3.50%
Safari 4.23% 4.30% +0.07% +1.70%
iPad Safari 5.38% 5.30% -0.08% -1.50%
Opera 1.76% 1.72% -0.04% -2.30%
Others 3.53% 3.54% +0.01% +0.30%

Worldwide Desktop & Tablet Browser Statistics, September 2015 to September 2016

The following table shows browser usage movements during the past twelve months:

Browser September 2015 September 2016 change relative
Chrome 53.24% 58.89% +5.65% +10.60%
Firefox 15.87% 13.66% -2.21% -13.90%
IE11 9.88% 7.68% -2.20% -22.30%
oldIE 5.83% 2.13% -3.70% -63.50%
Edge 0.96% 2.78% +1.82% +189.60%
Safari 9.14% 9.60% +0.46% +5.00%
Opera 1.76% 1.72% -0.04% -2.30%
Others 3.32% 3.54% +0.22% +6.60%

(The tables show market share estimates for desktop browsers. The ‘change’ column is the absolute increase or decrease in market share. The ‘relative’ column indicates the proportional change, i.e. 7.4% of oldIE users migrated elsewhere last month. There are several caveats so I recommend you read How Browser Market Share is Calculated and StatCounter vs NetMarketShare.)

It’s another month of minimal movement in the charts. Most browsers fluctuated in their normal direction, i.e. Chrome grew at the expense of others. There was a small increase for IE11, but I suspect a statistical blip rather than a resurgence.

Microsoft Edge logoThe most surprising fall was Microsoft Edge. “Fall” is a little over-dramatic — “wobble” may be more appropriate — but it’s the first time the browser has dropped. Currently, usage is similar to oldIE, and around a third of IE11’s.

Edge has been with us for more than a year, but is yet to make a significant impact on the chart. The browser evolved from IE, but the Trident engine was radically overhauled. The result has been positive:

  • the interface is simple and attractive
  • Edge starts and runs as fast — if not faster — than competing browsers
  • the browser integrates well with Windows 10
  • it offers some novel features, such as Web Notes, to annotate and share pages
  • the Developer Tools are similar to those available elsewhere
  • HTML5 support is good. Edge has fewer cutting-edge features, but you’re unlikely to miss many.
  • extensions were added in the Windows 10 Anniversary update. These are mostly advertising blockers, shopping and service assistants, but more will come.

Windows still accounts for at least 80% of the desktop OS market and has a higher percentage in the business world. So why has Edge’s adoption remained comparatively low?

Legacy OS Support

Edge is only available on Windows 10. The launch was reasonably successful and, after a year, almost 25% of desktop users run the OS. However, Windows 7 still accounts for almost 40% of the market and is likely to remain high for several years. Microsoft will not release Edge for older editions of the OS, but they will eventually be upgraded or disappear as hardware breaks down.

Other vendors have no problem supporting older versions of Windows. Chrome could be installed on the 15-year-old Windows XP until April 2016. Admittedly, Microsoft has a more complex task since they must ensure backward compatibility across their whole product range. For example, they could have difficulty updating a web component which was required in Office or Visual Studio. The legacy OS problem will continue unless Microsoft can separate Windows and browser development.

Mobile Support

Users work on multiple devices: they expect tabs and bookmarks to be synchronized across their desktops, phones and tablets. Chrome is the obvious choice for Android users, and Safari is the only real browser on iOS. Third-party mobile browsers such as Firefox retain a niche appeal.

Microsoft abandoned the mobile market and never produced a browser for Android. There are rumors of a Surface smartphone, but Edge will continue to struggle against cross-platform options.

That Blue ‘e’ Icon

When Edge was announced, I thought that keeping the blue ‘e’ icon was a good idea, since existing IE users would recognize it. There’s a downside: many users think IE is awful. The browser radically improved from version 9, but mud sticks, and developers continued to berate the application. Users who have never heard of Edge think the blue ‘e’ icon is IE.

Perhaps it’s time to have a completely clean break from IE’s past?

Users are Increasingly Browser-Aware

Few users knew what a browser was a decade ago. Most retained their OS default, and this helped IE’s usage figures remain high (even some EU intervention had a negligible impact).

Google’s Chrome marketing push helped change perceptions. Users still may not know or care about differences between applications, but they’re regularly advised to switch to Chrome while browsing the web.

IE6 usage also remained artificially while businesses relied on legacy web/intranet applications which targeted the browser. They were written in the early 2000s when few other competitors existed. Those systems have been retired or upgraded, leaving IT departments free to impose whichever browser they choose.

Microsoft can no longer rely on Windows to push browser adoption. Stronger marketing could help, especially if users can be persuaded that Edge:

  • is a modern browser unshackled from IE
  • does not collate or retain your browsing activities
  • is as fast and uses fewer resources than competitors.

Perhaps Microsoft is not concerned about Edge’s adoption? We demanded a better browser, Windows needed one and Edge is more than capable. It’s just a shame few people will use Edge for anything more than downloading Chrome.

Worldwide Mobile Browser Statistics, August to September 2016

Mobile browser use regained August’s drop and increased by 0.87% during September. It now accounts for 47.18% of all web activity. The historical chart illustrates how agonizingly close desktop and mobile usage has become over the past few years.

The top mobile browsing applications for the month were:

Mobile Browser August September change relative
Chrome 39.02% 39.09% +0.07% +0.20%
iPhone 18.77% 17.90% -0.87% -4.60%
UC Browser 14.28% 17.04% +2.76% +19.30%
Opera Mini/Mobile 10.91% 9.77% -1.14% -10.40%
Samsung Internet 6.95% 6.86% -0.09% -1.30%
Android 6.81% 6.33% -0.48% -7.00%
IEMobile 1.38% 1.26% -0.12% -8.70%
Others 1.88% 1.75% -0.13% -6.90%

Like the desktop chart, there’s no significant change other than a 20% increase in UC Browser users. StatCounter adjusted the browser’s figures recently, owing to pre-rendering and other caching activities, so I suspect this is a similar anomaly.

See you next month.

Browser Trends October 2016: Microsoft Edges Downward

Microsoft Edge

In September, we discussed whether the browser wars are over. October’s StatCounter browser statistics provide further evidence for a slow-down …

Worldwide Desktop & Tablet Browser Statistics, August to September 2016

The following table shows browser usage movements during the past month.

Browser August September change relative
Chrome 58.44% 58.89% +0.45% +0.80%
Firefox 13.96% 13.66% -0.30% -2.10%
IE11 7.52% 7.68% +0.16% +2.10%
oldIE 2.30% 2.13% -0.17% -7.40%
Edge 2.88% 2.78% -0.10% -3.50%
Safari 4.23% 4.30% +0.07% +1.70%
iPad Safari 5.38% 5.30% -0.08% -1.50%
Opera 1.76% 1.72% -0.04% -2.30%
Others 3.53% 3.54% +0.01% +0.30%

Worldwide Desktop & Tablet Browser Statistics, September 2015 to September 2016

The following table shows browser usage movements during the past twelve months:

Browser September 2015 September 2016 change relative
Chrome 53.24% 58.89% +5.65% +10.60%
Firefox 15.87% 13.66% -2.21% -13.90%
IE11 9.88% 7.68% -2.20% -22.30%
oldIE 5.83% 2.13% -3.70% -63.50%
Edge 0.96% 2.78% +1.82% +189.60%
Safari 9.14% 9.60% +0.46% +5.00%
Opera 1.76% 1.72% -0.04% -2.30%
Others 3.32% 3.54% +0.22% +6.60%

(The tables show market share estimates for desktop browsers. The ‘change’ column is the absolute increase or decrease in market share. The ‘relative’ column indicates the proportional change, i.e. 7.4% of oldIE users migrated elsewhere last month. There are several caveats so I recommend you read How Browser Market Share is Calculated and StatCounter vs NetMarketShare.)

It’s another month of minimal movement in the charts. Most browsers fluctuated in their normal direction, i.e. Chrome grew at the expense of others. There was a small increase for IE11, but I suspect a statistical blip rather than a resurgence.

Microsoft Edge logoThe most surprising fall was Microsoft Edge. “Fall” is a little over-dramatic — “wobble” may be more appropriate — but it’s the first time the browser has dropped. Currently, usage is similar to oldIE, and around a third of IE11’s.

Edge has been with us for more than a year, but is yet to make a significant impact on the chart. The browser evolved from IE, but the Trident engine was radically overhauled. The result has been positive:

  • the interface is simple and attractive
  • Edge starts and runs as fast — if not faster — than competing browsers
  • the browser integrates well with Windows 10
  • it offers some novel features, such as Web Notes, to annotate and share pages
  • the Developer Tools are similar to those available elsewhere
  • HTML5 support is good. Edge has fewer cutting-edge features, but you’re unlikely to miss many.
  • extensions were added in the Windows 10 Anniversary update. These are mostly advertising blockers, shopping and service assistants, but more will come.

Windows still accounts for at least 80% of the desktop OS market and has a higher percentage in the business world. So why has Edge’s adoption remained comparatively low?

Legacy OS Support

Edge is only available on Windows 10. The launch was reasonably successful and, after a year, almost 25% of desktop users run the OS. However, Windows 7 still accounts for almost 40% of the market and is likely to remain high for several years. Microsoft will not release Edge for older editions of the OS, but they will eventually be upgraded or disappear as hardware breaks down.

Other vendors have no problem supporting older versions of Windows. Chrome could be installed on the 15-year-old Windows XP until April 2016. Admittedly, Microsoft has a more complex task since they must ensure backward compatibility across their whole product range. For example, they could have difficulty updating a web component which was required in Office or Visual Studio. The legacy OS problem will continue unless Microsoft can separate Windows and browser development.

Mobile Support

Users work on multiple devices: they expect tabs and bookmarks to be synchronized across their desktops, phones and tablets. Chrome is the obvious choice for Android users, and Safari is the only real browser on iOS. Third-party mobile browsers such as Firefox retain a niche appeal.

Microsoft abandoned the mobile market and never produced a browser for Android. There are rumors of a Surface smartphone, but Edge will continue to struggle against cross-platform options.

That Blue ‘e’ Icon

When Edge was announced, I thought that keeping the blue ‘e’ icon was a good idea, since existing IE users would recognize it. There’s a downside: many users think IE is awful. The browser radically improved from version 9, but mud sticks, and developers continued to berate the application. Users who have never heard of Edge think the blue ‘e’ icon is IE.

Perhaps it’s time to have a completely clean break from IE’s past?

Users are Increasingly Browser-Aware

Few users knew what a browser was a decade ago. Most retained their OS default, and this helped IE’s usage figures remain high (even some EU intervention had a negligible impact).

Google’s Chrome marketing push helped change perceptions. Users still may not know or care about differences between applications, but they’re regularly advised to switch to Chrome while browsing the web.

IE6 usage also remained artificially while businesses relied on legacy web/intranet applications which targeted the browser. They were written in the early 2000s when few other competitors existed. Those systems have been retired or upgraded, leaving IT departments free to impose whichever browser they choose.

Microsoft can no longer rely on Windows to push browser adoption. Stronger marketing could help, especially if users can be persuaded that Edge:

  • is a modern browser unshackled from IE
  • does not collate or retain your browsing activities
  • is as fast and uses fewer resources than competitors.

Perhaps Microsoft is not concerned about Edge’s adoption? We demanded a better browser, Windows needed one and Edge is more than capable. It’s just a shame few people will use Edge for anything more than downloading Chrome.

Worldwide Mobile Browser Statistics, August to September 2016

Mobile browser use regained August’s drop and increased by 0.87% during September. It now accounts for 47.18% of all web activity. The historical chart illustrates how agonizingly close desktop and mobile usage has become over the past few years.

The top mobile browsing applications for the month were:

Mobile Browser August September change relative
Chrome 39.02% 39.09% +0.07% +0.20%
iPhone 18.77% 17.90% -0.87% -4.60%
UC Browser 14.28% 17.04% +2.76% +19.30%
Opera Mini/Mobile 10.91% 9.77% -1.14% -10.40%
Samsung Internet 6.95% 6.86% -0.09% -1.30%
Android 6.81% 6.33% -0.48% -7.00%
IEMobile 1.38% 1.26% -0.12% -8.70%
Others 1.88% 1.75% -0.13% -6.90%

Like the desktop chart, there’s no significant change other than a 20% increase in UC Browser users. StatCounter adjusted the browser’s figures recently, owing to pre-rendering and other caching activities, so I suspect this is a similar anomaly.

See you next month.